The UN totalitarian plan for agriculture and food

COP28 was an opportunity for the UN, through the FAO , to make public its plan to reduce the carbon footprint of all human food throughout the chain that leads from the farm to the plate. This plan, which claims to govern agriculture as well as transport, conservation and sale, intends to put an end to hunger and malnutrition while promoting sustainable development, is a totalitarian attempt, under the guise of moral and technical progress. , to subject the human activities it encompasses to the obligation to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in order to achieve the objective set by the Paris agreement.

UN food plan does not eat bread

As is very often the case in UN publications, we find in this plan more or less vague proposals which demonstrate great common sense and very good intentions. Based on the observation that human food, if we count production, inputs, storage, transport and waste, generates a third of greenhouse gas emissions, he recommends improving these different areas to increase the efficiency of the whole. M de La Palisse could not have done better. Clean energy, restoration of soils and pastures, reduction of losses and waste, etc., are on the program. This is no easy task, and everything will depend on what we put behind these words. Regular climate summits will be responsible for assessing the implementation of these improvements, globally and by region.

“Rebalancing” the world using CO2

Two facts, however, can be deduced from all these words. One, the UN is installing a new global gas plant in order to move towards global governance, this time in terms of food and agriculture. Two, everything is subject to ecological dogma which is broken down into two articles that are not permitted to be discussed: firstly man warms the climate, then the main toxic agent of this operation is CO2, accompanied of a few accomplices such as methane, which is why it is necessary to reduce its emissions so that warming does not exceed 1.5 degrees C since 1850. These two facts make it possible to submit the entire world to the totalitarian injunction of the UN, in particular to punish the nations of the North for the benefit of the South. The plan thus provides for a “just transition” in agriculture and food by distinguishing the duties of rich and poor countries with a view to “better efficiency” and a “global rebalancing” of these activities.

Experts' virtuous agriculture produces little

Unsurprisingly, various “experts” (biodiversity, sustainable development, etc.) welcomed this effort towards “a just transition” while emphasizing that it “did not go far enough”. Patty Fong, program director of the Global Alliance for the Future of Food, which brings together around thirty NGOs, has of course advocated the total elimination of fossil fuels, for example. But chemical fertilizers have been the subject of debate: if their ban is desired by everyone, some recommend postponing it until later for poor countries whose productivity is too low. In a way, it is a tribute from vice to virtue, and an effort towards reality: it suggests that agriculture only provides food for the world's population through intensive practices.

More and more money for the UN totalitarian project

Generally speaking, everyone is asking for more money. According to the UN, the world is not funding enough to combat climate change in agriculture and food. Between 2000 and 2021, “only” 183 billion dollars would have been spent, or 4% of the 4,400 billion spent on the climate transition. Increasing these already enormous sums would allow the UN plan to govern and monitor agriculture and the food supply of humanity more and more closely to subject them to the dogmas of environmentalism. A gently totalitarian enterprise, nicely disguised as solidarity progress.

By Pauline Mille

Original article : https://reinformation.tv/totalitaire-onu-agriculture-alimentation-mille/