Have children for the dictator!
JANUARY 22, 2024/ by MARTINA CHARBONNEL https://marcha3200.wordpress.com
If you listened to the conspiracy theorists who said that the globalists wanted to reduce the population, by listening to Macron's last intervention, you discover that you were completely wrong. This man who entered into a marital union which could only be sterile, is extremely interested in other people's children, in your children who will soon no longer be your children but those of the State.. And how he adores children, he wants to rearm the demography. His political models being the worst dictators, he could not not imitate them in their obsession with the birth rate in order to supply the country with future soldiers. “Reset” is not a word chosen at random.
One could assume that there were more pressing problems, but for Macron, supreme authority involves total control of citizens from birth to death and even from fertilization. Perfection is to extend this power over the testicles and ovaries of the entire population by classifying it according to its degree of fertility or sterility. He would like to interfere even in the beds and in our privacy as if we belonged to him.
I don't know if he would go so far as to order fertilization confinements to increase the yield of human livestock, but if he could, he would. We can imagine that if he succeeded in imposing the social credit desired by the WEF, the good citizens would be those whose children for the dictator.
So this story of depopulation to save the planet, was it just conspiratorial madness? Not really, because let's not forget that Macron is the champion of double standards: He puts abortion in the Constitution and authorizes it until the end of the pregnancy but he wants to encourage women to have children.
Through blackmail, he forces 80% of the population of childbearing age to be injected with a gene product which will sterilize a large number of those vaccinated, but he is worried about the progression of infertility.
Is it to hide this crime against humanity at a time when he feels that the globalists have lost their bet? Does he want to test the fertility of young people to assess the extent of the damage caused by these experimental injections?
What difference does it make to know if people are fertile if we encourage them to change their gender by adopting a sterile sexuality?
Is he preparing the legalization of surrogacy with farms in France where the intensive breeding of human babies would be practiced?
Does he want to use alarming infertility figures and, like Georgia Méloni, justify the massive arrival of migrants to “rearm demographics”?
Or does he simply want to add what was missing to his panoply as a dictator, children raised in servitude to his omnipotence by destroying any emotional and social structure that they can find in a loving family.
Because beyond wanting to rule people's intimate lives, Macron has educational projects. These are the instructions of the WHO, which is no longer content with endangering the health of children by injecting them with toxic products from birth. The WHO wants to sexualize children from a young age using school.
The aim of school is not the emotional and sexual education of children. It is to educate them by providing them with the basis of knowledge which they can enrich until they become individuals capable of thinking for themselves. Teaching has moved away from this role for a long time.
As Minister of National Education, Gabriel Attal made a good impression but it was only an illusion. He knew that Elizabeth Borne would only stay in office long enough to complete a few 49-3s on crucial issues. His resignation was recorded and Gabriel Attal used the Ministry of National Education as a springboard, saying only wise and comforting proposals to refine his image as prime minister or even presidential candidate.
Chase away the natural, it comes back at a gallop. Gabriel Attal intends to apply Emmanuel Macron's fantasies. Just like that of Gabriel Attal, Macron's sexuality should remain in the intimate domain as that of all French people should be. But when these two people who are infertile through their sexuality have it in their heads to take care of the emotional and sexual lives of children, we can have legitimate concerns, especially with regard to children's trauma following the sexual education received at school.
These two people don't have the slightest idea what "being a parent" means. They do not understand that the emotional life of children depends on the love of loving parents who help them build themselves. Neither the state nor the republic likes children. That's not their role. In the best case they give them rights.
Since, in the name of equality, the right to a child became a demand, children's rights have regressed. By becoming a right, the child has lost part of his status as a human being. He is no longer considered in his individuality and the specificity of his needs is no longer respected. He becomes an object that can be shaped according to the most unhealthy ideologies, the instrument of all the dictatorships which need to counter the influence of his family which he is led to denounce if they are dissident.
But he is not just the object of ideological temptations. Deprived of his status as a child and the rights supposed to protect him, he falls prey to the most perverse delusions.
Parents. Protect your children! This is urgent if you don't want their education and love for them to completely escape you.